Aslickproductions.org/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=4rpmddblr0qsa28id791kk1410&action=profile;u=6;area=showposts;start=885e:/My Web Sites/Slick Productions - FFIV Message Board/slickproductions.org/forum/index05f8.htmlslickproductions.org/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=4rpmddblr0qsa28id791kk1410&action=profile;area=showposts;u=6e:/My Web Sites/Slick Productions - FFIV Message Board/slickproductions.org/forum/index05f8.html.zxh^KOKtext/htmlISO-8859-1gzip0|Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:30:52 GMT0 0Ph^. Show Posts - Deathlike2

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Deathlike2

886
General Discussion / Re: Upgrade time
« on: February 19, 2010, 10:30:00 PM »
Based on those charts, the GT240 is more power efficient than last gen's hardware of that same price range.

The best part is that the card uses the faster memory.

 :edit:
Just in case, you can read a review on it for some comparisons:
http://www.bjorn3d.com/read.php?cID=1761
http://www.bjorn3d.com/read.php?cID=1761&pageID=8430 - jump to power consumption

The review is based on the $50 video card (after rebate) being referenced.

887
Pandora's Box / Re: Suggestions
« on: February 19, 2010, 07:06:00 PM »
Swapping the morph list with the steal list would probably be a simple and probably more effective idea.
So now you want the morph list to be 2 items only? Or am I missing something?

You could share those lists for expansion I guess.

Personally, I'd rather see the ability to morph be more like the FF7 command since it sucks entirely in FF6 by design.

888
General Discussion / Re: Upgrade time
« on: February 19, 2010, 08:04:24 AM »
Alrighty.

lol @ the GT240 I've linked. From $60 (after rebate), it's now $50 (after rebate).

Heh.  :wink:

889
Pandora's Box / Re: Suggestions
« on: February 18, 2010, 08:47:50 PM »
Swapping the morph list with the steal list would probably be a simple and probably more effective idea.

890
Pandora's Box / Re: Suggestions
« on: February 18, 2010, 01:45:02 PM »
1) i like the Steal/Capture idea of having an enemy go into a frenzy if you steal their prized item.  it'd be nice to have enemies actually be aware of what they're carrying for a change.  as it is now, they don't seem to know they have the items, let alone care when you pilfer them. :)  and do monsters dedicate a limb to holding this equipment, or is it accidentally adhered to them by tar or brambles or something?

It is somewhere on the body. One wonder what Locke does to the guy to "make stuff happen".

Quote
the difficulty i see here is: does the conventional Steal/Capture counter trigger on any attempted steal, and not just successful ones?  if so, you'd have to supplement it with a custom FC command where the enemy calls new code that reads its Stealable item slots.

Did you manage to skip Locke's scenario?  :tongue:

AFAIK, Steal/Capture is reacted to a successful steal, so Zozo's Harvester reacts with a steal of its own AFAIK.

You would certainly have to handle the case of a failed steal anyways... although I'm trying to recall how Capture is handled with respect to hitting the target (the attack portion of the stealing, not the steal portion).

Quote
2) also in the Steal area, i never quite understood why a foe's Stealable items and Winnable items could have no intersection whatsoever.  Square means to tell us that if you fail to steal that Iron Helmet from an enemy during battle, you'll never have a chance of winning it, but can net a Blizzard instead?  does the first item get flung into a faraway land as you deal the last strike on the monster?  or does the enemy undergo a chemical change upon expiration that causes its possessions to change?  i'm interested in any rationale people can come up with, since it doesn't make much sense to me.

This used to be done in FF4 (not sure about previous FFs). That was scrapped for FF5. Go figure, I would think a rational theme for item drops would be nice, but commands like Steal are underrated I guess.

Quote
now, merging these two categories could limit the uniqueness of Steal, and arguably reduce challenge, as you get two "cracks" at a desired item.  so maybe i should just suspend my disbelief and pretend a fallen enemy can somehow make one item disappear, and another take its place.. :/

I'd rather have some semblance of variation in monsters (different starting HP/MP, monster AI scripts, etc.), but I'd say it's better than having predictable useless items steals in this game.

891
General Discussion / Re: Gamefaqs + eternal stupidity
« on: February 18, 2010, 10:44:27 AM »
I'm not sure how resistance to Rippler via Imp resistance is gamebreaking by any stretch of the imagination... especially when it is rarely used.

892
General Discussion / Re: Upgrade time
« on: February 18, 2010, 10:42:03 AM »
Has it been decided or is there even an ETA to buy this stuff? :P

http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDealDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.336175 - best current deal at the moment on Newegg

It's an eVGA GT240 with GDDR5 memory and already overclocked (manufacturer honors their own warranties already overclocked hardware).

893
General Discussion / Re: Upgrade time
« on: February 10, 2010, 05:21:22 PM »
NVNews has a great NVidia price tracker... a GT 240 can be had for $60 after rebate ($90 normally).

http://www.mwave.com/mwave/SKUSearch_v3.asp?px=PG&scriteria=BD11210

894
General Discussion / Re: NFL season (2009-2010), week 21 - playoffs?!
« on: February 08, 2010, 09:38:09 AM »
Quote
Note: I picked the fish out because... that game was played there. Sure it's not the fish they are playing against, but it's ironic how both teams had played there in "preparation" for this game.

In sum, if you looked at the history of this year's games... you might have come to the same conclusion I did.... or most of you just "wrote off" the Saints because you didn't do some reasonable analysis.

what's with the quip at the end?  if you read my post, you'll see i covered both the common Patriots and Dolphins matchups, said the Saints relatively outperformed the Colts against these teams, and pointed out that the earlier Miami games were especially important given it's the Super Bowl location.

other factors caused me to pick the Colts, but don't pretend i didn't do "reasonable analysis".  it was a long post, but i got into the Miami comparison as early as the 4th sentence.  hard to miss it, really.

It was more specific towards Leno. My bad for not being specific.

Quote
you talk as if your 5-6 overall playoff record somehow beats my 5-6 overall playoff record. :tongue:  there are no bonus points for self-congratulation.  nor are there any for detouring at the end of the post just to bash Mr. Favre again.  have you no shame, sir? :P

I just like my SB pick better. :D

I have no shame in pointing out how overrated he is. However, I will give him some leeway given the state of his health after the pounding he got... which in part affected his "dumb" decision. It doesn't stop the fact that he made the throw that no QB should be making...

 :edit:

I had forgotten to mention that onside kick... as the result was great for the Saints... but it could've been the terrible call that would cost the Saints.

895
General Discussion / Re: NFL season (2009-2010), week 21 - playoffs?!
« on: February 07, 2010, 11:16:54 PM »
Congrats to the Saints... my disdain for the Colts is my own, but I don't think many people thought they would only score 17 points. Obviously the game really turned huge when Peyton threw a bad pass... which was really the game clincher.

The Colts all season did not really play against great QBs.. the best they faced was Brady despite the game that was dubbed "4th and 2". That defense isn't as great as one would've thought. Those close comeback games are attributed to Peyton, but also offenses that were able to score on that Colts defense early... just not late game. The Saints are not really that team to be slowed down by that..

Here's a quick look at two notable games in both the Saints and Colts seasons...

1) Pats @ Colts - 4th and 2.. remember the Pats scored 34 points on that defense. Only the Peyton Manning comeback and 4th and 2 were the real difference.

2) Pats @ Saints - The Saints just rolled... period.

3) Colts @ Dolphins - This MNF game was close... and a blitz by the fish cost them a TD and a win.

4) Saints @ Dolphins - Despite having gotten down some huge scoring hole, the Saints manage to battle back. The fish weren't bad, but they couldn't simply roll the Wildcat out all day... as they simply could not do much once the Saints got rolling.

Note: I picked the fish out because... that game was played there. Sure it's not the fish they are playing against, but it's ironic how both teams had played there in "preparation" for this game.

In sum, if you looked at the history of this year's games... you might have come to the same conclusion I did.... or most of you just "wrote off" the Saints because you didn't do some reasonable analysis.

So there!  :tongue:

 :edit:

In addition.. Freeney had some impact early on.. but his name wasn't mentioned at the later half. This translated to a dramatically weaker pass rush. I mean Mathis was around... but not fast or close enough. It was impressive early game to see him... but then not surprising how it ended up to be. To win in the NFL, you have to get a pass rush to the QB with whatever the cost. You don't necessarily have to get a sack, but you have to force a throw from the guy and pray the secondary holds its end of the deal. That is the new passing NFL where your ability to stuff the run is not so important (Colts had the most yards on the ground for that game, while having the #32 ranked run game). So even if you have Adrian Peterson and a tough run defense like the Vikings do, the game is still up to the QB (Favre) to succeed (which, I don't have to remind you of).

896
General Discussion / Re: NFL season (2009-2010), week 21 - playoffs?!
« on: February 07, 2010, 08:44:26 PM »
Two words: WHO DAT

Two more words: I WIN!

897
General Discussion / Re: Upgrade time
« on: February 07, 2010, 08:00:14 AM »
ATI does have faster products at the same price point, but I don't believe ATI's OpenGL drivers has stood up long enough to be even close to NVidia's status in that dept (especially if you plan on running Linux).

898
General Discussion / Re: NFL season (2009-2010), week 21 - playoffs?!
« on: February 07, 2010, 07:57:27 AM »
I want the Saints to win, more than anything. One reason is a bit self-conscience, I'd rather we lost to the champs, not get beaten by the guys that got beaten by the champs.

Favre threw another INT! Amazing!

Quote
However, too much has to go right for the Saints to win. Yes, that means I'm picking the Colts, and I'm hoping it's close all the way through.

I'm pretty sure everyone believes the Colts are more likely to win that game. However, it's another Sunday.

Quote
* Lenophis awaits the post of Deathlike2 countering specific points just to spite people

There's nothing to counter or spite. It will be a passing match of epic scoring proportions. It might simply come down to whoever has the ball last. Neither defense will hold it throughout the entire game, especially if Dwight Freeney is in a limited role.

I have picked the Saints, despite knowing that the Colts have the upper hand for the most part, but not everything can be accounted for on any given Sunday and I don't think that either team would be outmatched... perhaps moreso outplayed.

899
General Discussion / Re: So I got a ticket....
« on: February 05, 2010, 11:24:32 PM »
It's worth arguing, if only to get out of the ticket. It's really a bonus if the officer doesn't show up.

900
General Discussion / Re: Upgrade time
« on: February 03, 2010, 08:08:08 PM »
It's 2 1GB sticks... I'm not sure if your mobo runs dual channel, but you are better off setting it up that way.