Game Modification Station / Re: New patch: Anonymous Attack Bug fix
« on: December 13, 2016, 12:58:32 AM »
øA slickproductions.org /forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=5f0fck550j2m4m2fpbtkj2vkm1&action=profile;u=363;area=showposts;start=270 e:/My Web Sites/Slick Productions - FFIV Message Board/slickproductions.org/forum/indexd4c7-2.html slickproductions.org /forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=5f0fck550j2m4m2fpbtkj2vkm1&action=profile;area=showposts;u=363 e:/My Web Sites/Slick Productions - FFIV Message Board/slickproductions.org/forum/indexd4c7-2.html.z x A–h^ ÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÈ @> îÈ OK text/html ISO-8859-1 gzip 8:Ö îÈ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:58:18 GMT 0ó° °® 0® P® €§² ð® @–h^ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿE" îÈ
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
December 12, 2016
December 13, 2016
December 15, 2016seems like the solution would be to supplement the C2/2D71 call (at C2/303E) with a duplication of C2/0616-061C and C2/2DC2-2DC8. a full-on C2/0610 or $2DC1 call would probably be too much.
Shadow at Colosseum doesn't have a script, iirc, so would be fully unaffected by the Special change. and returning Gau should be meaninglessly affected, as he doesn't attack.
the trickier question is whether to load Regular weapon graphic too.
special attack name aside, does that screw animation, properties and effect as well?
GBA port.
Priority 1 or 2 will make it display correctly and it originally had priority 2, so...maybe I could have left that part alone. Oh well, I don't think it really matters.

July 13, 2017F0 x1 y1 CD x2 y2 FF CD x3 y3 FF