Category: Internet etiquette

  • Speedrun.com Allegedly Removes Creative Commons License (Again)

    And Claims Ownership of Speedrun Data

    For clymax’s projects, click here. You can also follow him on YouTube or Twitter.

    This blog post will be updated as this story develops.

    Says alternative speedrun website therun.gg on Twitter following a blog post here on the same subject of the changes announced by SRC here:

    Wii Series Speedrunning Responds

    SRC to Revise New Terms of Use

    So, what do you think? Will you continue to use SRC after this update? Comment below, or come check us out on Discord.

    This post has been viewed 24 time(s).

  • Wii Series Speedrunning to Speedrun.com: Reinstate Creative Commons

    Open Letter in Response to Recent Changes in Terms of Use

    Background:

    Original Letter: https://x.com/cyndifusic/status/2107281580700164503

    For archival purposes, a mirror of the open letter follows.

    October 5, 2026

    To: support@speedrun.com

    To the staff of speedrun.com,

    This email comes from the community leaders of Wii Series Speedrunning. We handle a series of 12 “Wii”-branded games including ones like Wii Sports and Wii Play, and we’ve been using your website for over a decade. So we remember what you said in 2021, when you reversed the first removal of Creative Commons licensing from our run data. You said you “strongly believe in SR.C as an open platform for use by communities”, and that you “see it as [your] job to keep this information available online forever”. After nearly 200 comments on your terms of use update, it’s evident the broader speedrunning community overwhelmingly disagrees with your new definition of “available”. We are no different.

    The prominent explanation you provide is that the world has changed. People are scared about how generative Al services have reshaped the online world, and speedrunners are at the forefront of that apprehension. So naturally, that’s where you’ve steered the conversation. Sadly, you say, Creative Commons was a dream of a different time, one where Al bots weren’t harvesting all our data. But what exactly were we supposed to do about that before? You’re a couple years late. We’re all dealing with the growing compromise of our personal information, including things frankly far more pressing than how fast we completed a round of 9-hole golf. Even beyond that, as people have begun to vocalize in your comments, Al companies don’t care about licensing policies, and in fact often intentionally ignore them. One user even likened your copyright to “a cardboard sign saying ‘bots go away’”. Upon a closer read of your post, other lines start to jump out more, such as “putting leaderboards on another site or scraping them now needs our okay first”. Hey, wait a minute. Putting leaderboards on another site? What does that have to do with any of this?

    This is the elephant in the room, and there’s no more time to talk around it. You have competition. Particularly, the continued development of therun.gg has changed speedrunning, and you’re well aware of the recent beta launch of their own leaderboard system. Over the past two weeks, we’ve been working behind the scenes with therun developer Joey to test his leaderboard maintenance features with our games. The games we oversee are unique in nature from most traditional speedrun category schemes, and have unique needs. Joey has gathered more feedback on those needs in a matter of days than speedrun.com has in years. And it’s not just us – the writing’s been on the wall for a while. With features like real-time LiveSplit integration and race interfaces, therun is building a dream for speedrunners. We know this is what you’re talking about in your safeguards against “substantially similar” websites to your own. What you’re offering instead are vague allusions to “new services”. No information has been provided about what you might bring to the table, besides that it’s planned for “coming years”. It is hard for us not to see this as a platitude rather than a proficient attempt to catch up with the modern era of speedrunning. To suppress modern speedrunning services in spite of that is something we cannot stand behind.

    Beyond the existence of any competitor, the most important piece of criticism is the disservice to every individual user of your website. All of us are capable of evaluating the landscape of the modern internet. In our corner of it, the absolute freedom of information between every user and community has been foundational for as long as speedrunning has existed. Of course we know we individually own our runs – that is not adequate. We do not feel any differently about this in 2026 than we did in 2021, or in 2013 when the site was founded.

    We, the organizers and moderators of Wii Series, believe strongly in the future of speedrunning, with new events on the horizon and the upcoming release of Nintendo Switch Sports Resort. If your terms of use stay the same, it is our express opinion that this future is incompatible with speedrun.com.

    Sincerely,

    Kataryn (cyndifusic), and:

    – The Wii Series Speedrunning Admin Team:
    cyndifusic, SMMidi, Plyd, dragonz, and CringeDaisy;

    – The Wii Series Speedrunning Event Organizers:
    SMMidi, Dqwavious, Plyd, MineXeniM, and cyndifusic;

    – The Wii Series Speedrunning Leaderboard Moderators:

    Wii Sports: Plyd, EmoadNomad, MrJimmysteel25

    Wii Sports Resort: dragonz, Alaskaxp2, Benson, EmoadNomad, Zennan

    Wii Sports Club: CedrikPle, EmoadNomad, Jonasty

    Wii Play: cyndifusic, JayWaaking, Artemis, CedrikPle, SMMidi, Th3on3C

    Wii Play: Motion: CedrikPle, JayWaaking, SMMidi

    Wii Fit (Plus): dragonz, CountGooby

    Wii Fit U: Cedrik Ple, TehWhack, dragonz

    Wii Party: AdamLikeScars, Randomno, AmunSR, Zennan

    Wii Party U: Cedrik Ple, TehWhack, Sowedu

    Wii Music: 8vaLuigi, GaryJ, Shockwave TLS

    Wii Chess: dragonz

    Nintendo Switch Sports: Fleptypaper, theriverp, JadenPlayz, Major_tom

    Multiple Wii Series Games: dragonz, ronan

    This post has been viewed 8 time(s).

  • Romhack.ing Silently Bans Romhacker clymax from Its Discord Server and Then Refuses to Take Down His Romhacks When Asked To

    Romhacks Were Never Submitted to the Site But Were Imported from RHDN’s 2024 Dump

    For clymax’s projects, click here. You can also follow him on YouTube or Twitter.

    Banned Without Warning

    The Discord ban came without warning or notification and was not discovered until July 6, 2025.

    Subsequently, the following message was sent to Romhack.ing (RHDI) staff via the RHDI website.

    May 29, 2026

    Last year, I randomly discovered I got banned from the RHDI Discord without warning or explanation.

    As a result, I regretfully submit a request to take down my hacks hosted on the site.

    Thank you for your kind attention in this matter.

    Takedown Request Rejected

    RHDI staff promptly replied:

    May 30, 2026

    Thank you for your message. After seeing your takedown request, we categorically reject it on the grounds of it being in response to a ban.

    On that note, we checked our records, and we can confirm that you were in fact banned. It was due to a violation of the following rule:

    No advertising or referrals unless it’s approved by staff.

    I will admit, a ban (without warning) is rather heavy handed for this. But if you would like to appeal and agree to follow the server rules, we can lift the ban.

    Alternative Just as Tyrannical

    One of our Hacking Legends, solidification, had this to say when notified of the news (quoted with permission):

    Imao you don’t own your own hacks

    But good to know that something that was literally spun up in response to t[yr]annical nonsense from RHDN in its ownership and potential loss is, uh, tyrannical

    The hacks and translations, now believed to be illegally hosted on RHDI, can be seen here.

    These hacks and translations were never submitted to RHDI by yours truly.

    Instead, they were imported from RHDN’s data dump from August 2024, as we previously reported here.

    So, what do you think? What’s worse, the silent ban or the refusal to honor a hack author’s takedown request? Would you want to submit your work to RHDI?

    Related Posts

    This post has been viewed 43 time(s).

  • Romhacking.net Rejects Link Exchange with Gaming Fansite for Giving Coverage to Alternative Repository

    Claims Romhack Plaza “Actively Sabotages” RHDN

    For clymax’s projects, click here. You can also follow him on YouTube or Twitter.

    [Editor’s note: the info in this post is shared for the sake of transparency and accountability in the romhacking scene. Please do not contact or harass any party known or believed to be involved, due to this post.]

    In response to an invitation to exchange links with a gaming fansite (not named in this post), RHDN allegedly responded:

    Right away in your ‘Applying ROMhack Patches (NES & SNES)’, there is no mention of ROMhacking.net anywhere, or its online patcher (https://www.romhacking.net/patch/).

    Instead, it was chosen to feature romhackplaza.org/romhacks.org which actively sabotages our site (https://www.reddit.com/r/romhacking/comments/18xgc3b/romhacksorg_admin_sabotaged_romhackingnet).

    We can’t be affiliated with such nonsense. Sorry.

    This is despite the cited Reddit thread being nearly three years old.

    It is despite the individual alleged to have engaged in the activity having been removed from site staff along with an official explanation being given. If you’re unaware, see the Related Post below.

    And it is despite both romhacking repositories having since apparently changed owners.

    More importantly, the claim that RHDN is still being actively sabotaged seems spurious on its face. No evidence was provided in support of that assertion.

    Is this what our romhacking community should be all about?

    So, what do you think? Comment below, or come check us out on Discord.

    Related Post:

    This post has been viewed 25 time(s).